|
Post by LymeEnigma on Dec 24, 2007 11:12:47 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by enochroot on Jan 2, 2008 7:14:29 GMT -8
Thanks for this and all the other "heads up" listings on possible diseases!
|
|
|
Post by LymeEnigma on Jan 2, 2008 10:15:00 GMT -8
My pleasure!
|
|
|
Post by LymeEnigma on Jan 15, 2008 10:31:03 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by LymeEnigma on Feb 4, 2008 17:39:48 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by LymeEnigma on Feb 5, 2008 10:29:42 GMT -8
It seems to me that there are numerous Borrelia species capable of causing varying degrees of illness in human beings, and by classifying many of these as either "Lyme" or "relapsing fever" we lose countless patients in the cracks.
I think about my ELISA and Western blot. I had a lot positive ELISA (1.16, and my twin sis tested at .90), and the Western blot bands that came up were:
IgG 23-25 IND 30 ++ 39 IND 41 IND 66 + 83-93 IND
IgM 30 ++ 31 IND 34 + 39 + 41 +
My Igenex IgM Western blot was "Igenex positive" yet "CDC negative." Might more than simple test unreliability be responsible for this? I think so. Why are HIV and syphilis ELISA titers considered reliable, and yet the Lyme titer is accepted as unreliable because of the spirochete's evasive nature and what it does to one's immune system? Yeah, Bb is very sophisticated for a pathogen, but is it really that hard to test for?
I honestly believe that those who are presenting with more severe of disease simply have a strain of Borrelia that science (or your typical GP) has not delineated from Bb, and that many chronic patients (probably all of us who are current posters here) are suffering from something worse than Lyme, a type of (or more than one) relapsing fever that eludes Lyme blood tests (by causing borderline or low-positive ELISAs and "negative" Western blots) because the antibody response is similar enough, yet not similar enough....
I'm going to start a new thread.
|
|
|
Post by LymeEnigma on Apr 5, 2008 10:29:47 GMT -8
Relapsing Fever–Like Spirochetes Infecting European Vector Tick of Lyme Disease Agent: Abstract: To determine whether relapsing fever–like spirochetes associated with hard ticks may infect Ixodes ricinus ticks in central Europe, we screened questing ticks for 16S rDNA similar to that of Asian and American relapsing fever–like spirochetes. We compared the prevalence of these spirochetes to that of Lyme disease spirochetes transmitted by the same vector. Relapsing fever-like spirochetes infect 3.5% of questing vector ticks in our three central European sites near the Rhein Valley. These spirochetes differ genetically from their American and Asian analogs while being relatively homogeneous in the region we sampled. The Lyme disease genospecies most commonly detected in central Europe are distributed broadly, whereas those that are less frequently found appear to be place-specific. The absence of co-infected ticks suggests that relapsing fever–like and Lyme disease spirochetes may not share hosts. Exposure risk for relapsing fever–like spirochetes is similar to that of certain Lyme disease genospecies. Although many persons may be bitten by ticks infected by relapsing fever–like spirochetes, health implications remain unknown. Full text: www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EiD/vol9no6/02-0459.htm
|
|
|
Post by LymeEnigma on Apr 5, 2008 10:30:44 GMT -8
Vector Interactions and Molecular Adaptations of Lyme Disease and Relapsing Fever Spirochetes Associated with Transmission by Ticks: Abstract: Pathogenic spirochetes in the genus Borrelia are transmitted primarily by two families of ticks. The Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi, is transmitted by the slow-feeding ixodid tick Ixodes scapularis, whereas the relapsing fever spirochete, B. hermsii, is transmitted by Ornithodoros hermsi, a fast-feeding argasid tick. Lyme disease spirochetes are generally restricted to the midgut in unfed I. scapularis. When nymphal ticks feed, the bacteria pass through the hemocoel to the salivary glands and are transmitted to a new host in the saliva after 2 days. Relapsing fever spirochetes infect the midgut in unfed O. hermsi but persist in other sites including the salivary glands. Thus, relapsing fever spirochetes are efficiently transmitted in saliva by these fast-feeding ticks within minutes of their attachment to a mammalian host. We describe how B. burgdorferi and B. hermsii change their outer surface during their alternating infections in ticks and mammals, which in turn suggests biological functions for a few surface-exposed lipoproteins. Full text: www.medscape.com/viewarticle/424731
|
|
|
Post by LymeEnigma on Apr 5, 2008 10:31:45 GMT -8
Relapsing Fever in Texas: In a previous publication we (1) showed that the serum of rats solidly hyperimmunized to Borrelia novyi contained lytic bodies for the Texas relapsing fever spirochete. The serum of rats similarly hyperimmunized to strains of the Texas spirochete was shown to be lytic for Borrelia novyi. Since this cytolytic property was not observed in these sera for other strains of relapsing fever spirochetes, Borrelia kochi, Borrelia duttoni, and Borrelia obermeieri, we concluded that the Texas relapsing fever spirochete is closely related to, if not identical with, Borrelia novyi. Brumpt (2) has recently shown that a strict specificity exists between the vector of relapsing fever in Texas, O. turicata, and the spirochete causing the disease. He found that this particular tick did not transmit other known strains of relapsing fever spirochetes, and, for that matter, that there was a similar degree of specificity between other vectors and spirochetes as they occur in different localities. www.ajtmh.org/cgi/content/abstract/s1-14/2/159
|
|